ARGOMENTO:

A proposito di Eternity, i big ci sono un po' tutti. Io voto per iscrivere il team.

+1
Ps. Se non ho contato male siamo già in 4 ad averci scaccolato, mentre su Bitboinc siamo in 5

zioriga ha scritto:

Incomincio ad avere qualche obiezione su questo progetto:
- come fa un singolo sviluppatore produrre i codici per tutti i sottoprogetti ? e tenerli aggiornati ?
- a che titolo lo fa ?
- chi sono gli "scienziati" dietro le sue spalle?

Sta forse utilizzando l'AI per creare i programmi ??

There are no scientists directly involved in my projects. I am reviving projects that scientists previously explored and eventually abandoned because they lacked sufficient resources to carry them through. I do this with the help of AI, but I personally identify the projects, investigate the underlying research, and gather the relevant information before providing it to AI systems for implementation and development.

I use multiple AI agents, as well as two LLMs that I have trained myself. I obtain raw data from universities, research centers, and institutes. Some of the applications I develop are entirely original, while others are existing methods adapted for distributed computing.

I take data accuracy very seriously. The generated results have been independently checked with the assistance of several academics and Claude for Science. Before publishing any dataset, I also rerun the computations and cross-check the results across three servers. I publish all the data on Zenodo, so anyone can download the raw data, independently reproduce the calculations using their own methods, and verify my datasets for themselves.

I honestly do not understand the reason behind the attacks and attempts to discredit my work that you may have seen on BOINC forums and Reddit. Some people seem to assume that all I do is tell an AI, "Build me a scientific project," and then publish whatever it produces. That is simply not what happens. There is substantial work involved in identifying promising research, obtaining source data, selecting appropriate methods, developing computational applications, validating the results, and publishing the resulting datasets transparently.

This situation began after a person named Ian started attacking me for reasons I still do not understand. He has one of the highest RAC scores on BOINC, and my impression is that he acts as though he owns the BOINC platform and has the authority to decide whose work deserves to be taken seriously.

I believe scientific work should be judged on its methodology, reproducibility, and evidence—not dismissed simply because AI was used as a tool in its development. That is precisely why I make my datasets publicly available and provide opportunities for independent verification.

Many thanks for you reply

I appreciated your intense work and the continous and stressful effort for so many projects and computer versions.

Can I wait for other projects ???